"Then there’s gender attribution, whereby we look at somebody and say, “that’s a man,” or “that’s a woman.” And this is important because the way we percieve another’s gender affects the way we relate to that person. Gender attribution is the sneaky one. It’s the one we do all the time without thinking about it; kinda like driving a sixteen-wheeler down a crowded highway… without thinking about it.
In this culture, gender attribution, like gender assignment, is phallo-centric. That is, one is male until perceived otherwise. According to a study by Kessler and McKenna, one can extrapolate that it would take the presence of roughly four female cues to outweigh the presence of one male cue: one is assumed male until proven otherwise. That’s one reason why many women today get “sirred” whereas very few men get called “ma’am."

Kate Bornstein, Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women, and the Rest of US

  1. radiergummi reblogged this from homoerotics
  2. izelyoniipopugai reblogged this from ineffablevegetable
  3. ineffablevegetable reblogged this from homoerotics
  4. winchestermoon reblogged this from supernatural-obsession
  5. boopinbabbit reblogged this from homoerotics
  6. xlostlenore reblogged this from homoerotics
  7. lazarus-james reblogged this from rosebadwolf-tyler
  8. tellytubs reblogged this from homoerotics
  9. supernatural-obsession reblogged this from rosebadwolf-tyler
  10. gaffosske reblogged this from homoerotics
  11. leavingthiscage reblogged this from homoerotics
  12. notyour-sidekick reblogged this from homoerotics
  13. belegstrongbows reblogged this from homoerotics
  14. rosebadwolf-tyler reblogged this from homoerotics
  15. bigredcandle42 reblogged this from homoerotics
  16. morenormalthanaverage reblogged this from homoerotics
  17. super-villains reblogged this from homoerotics
  18. voiceofthetunnels reblogged this from homoerotics
  19. topazpocky reblogged this from homoerotics
  20. homoerotics reblogged this from aforaffort