vampirickilometer:

bonegrammaticality:

NO LISTEN, SERIOUSLY GUYS

  1. What you call “correct grammar” is a social construct which is useful to know specifically because people will equate it with your level of education when you are trying to, say, apply for jobs, or get a book published, or the like. It is otherwise mainly a tool to divide people with a certain level of education from people without.
  2. What you call “incorrect grammar” is colloquial language, it is the native English learned by that speaker during childhood, and it follows complex rules of its own. NO NATIVE SPEAKER OF ENGLISH SPEAKS BAD OR STUPID ENGLISH. THAT’S NOT HOW LANGUAGE WORKS.
  3. THEREFORE, when you call people on “incorrect grammar,” the effect is often that of drawing attention to speech patterns that are perceived as signifiers of a person’s social background or education level. It is particularly important to keep this in mind when you are addressing a person’s language when they are in a space where they feel more comfortable or safe, and thus might want to use their native grammar rather than the socially imposed standard. 

I’m pretty sure that most of you don’t intentionally do that sort of thing, so you should probably be aware that that’s what you’re doing.

i used to do this a lot and i really regret it now. 

also a thought that maybe people don’t need to use formally imposed grammar because does it really matter? as long as the people they are intending to communicate with can understand what’s being said, isn’t the point of language being achieved? standardisation of language conventions is helpful for efficiency and comprehension but i rarely see criticism of grammar where the critic can’t understand what’s being said — mostly cases where they absolutely can and prove it by the way they give their criticism.

and then a thought that maybe people don’t want to speak and write a language (especially english) that they were forced into, maybe those of us who lost our native language to be more easily assimilated into cultures not our own would like to hold onto and display the ways our language differs from the standard. or maybe we want to speak and write in non-formally-standard ways because that is the way people we know speak and write. 

note that i say “we” here as a largely generalised group. though i do speak as someone who learned english second and lost their first language (spanish) to go to a usa school

also shout out to my descriptivists because even aside from all this descriptivism is just where it’s at, yo

(Source: hereincoherent, via hairypitsandtits)

2,219 notes

Punks, Bulldaggers and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?, Cathy J. Cohen

Punks, Bulldaggers and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?, Cathy J. Cohen

18 notes

I finally figured out a term for this

ceepolk:

dolgematki:

fromonesurvivortoanother:

You know how white liberal people are so quick to support gay marriage, but then they completely ignore things like violence against GSM people of color, or higher rates of GSM youth incarceration, abuse, and homelessness, or there being no legal protections for being fired or evicted for being gay or non-binary?

TRICKLE DOWN JUSTICE

Like I believe marriage is important— especially the legal protections and privileges it comes with. But when people are regularly dying and being abused because they are not hetero or cisgender, and no one wants to talk about it…that’s Trickle Down Justice. Because the impression is that getting this one single goal will suddenly make things better, and that these are the only “rights” people need to fight for. We don’t want to be critical of our society and how things like race, gender, and class affect how a trans person of color is treated. Or how there are a ton of homeless Queer youth. Or how marriage in general is still very flawed and assimilationist.

We don’t want to admit that this “big step” we are fighting for is only really going to help a small subset of the actual LGBT population.

This is something to think about.

…Trickle Down Justice

That’s perfect

and the comparison to urine doesn’t even miss a beat

Dean Spade actually has a really great theory about this called Trickle-Up Social Justice (link is to video)

(via strugglingtobeheard)


Guillermo Gómez-Peña and Coco Fusco’s explore the notions of gender, race, sex, ethnicity, colonialism, and assimilation in their art performances.

Guillermo Gómez-Peña and Coco Fusco’s explore the notions of gender, race, sex, ethnicity, colonialism, and assimilation in their art performances.

(Source: sinidentidades)